FAA Administrator Bedford Says AI-Supported SMART System Could Improve Business Aviation Access to National Airspace
Why It MattersBusiness aviation's unscheduled flying sits outside the schedule-driven logic airspace tools were built around, so access to predictive traffic management will decide whether general-aviation operators gain visibility or stay on the margins.
What happened
FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford said Tuesday that the agency's new AI-supported air traffic management system could improve access to the National Airspace System for business aviation operators. He was speaking at the NBAA Business Aviation Convention & Exhibition in Las Vegas, where he addressed concerns about how the Strategic Management of Airspace, Routes and Trajectories (SMART) platform would accommodate unscheduled flights alongside airline operations.

Introduced in September, SMART combines approximately 200 data streams covering weather, flight paths, airspace capacity and controller staffing. The system uses predictive analytics to identify potential congestion and recommend adjustments to routes and departure times before disruptions develop. The FAA said SMART began limited operations around Washington, D.C., on Sept. 21, ahead of a planned nationwide rollout.
Bedford said: "I think it's a huge improvement for business aviation, because today you have zero visibility into access into the national airspace system." He also described the wider air traffic control modernization program, which includes replacing aging radar and communications equipment, expanding controller staffing and redesigning congested airspace. Congress has provided an initial $12.5 billion for the effort, and the agency is seeking an additional $30 billion to complete its planned upgrades.
On staffing and airspace, Bedford said: "We need to continue to hire controllers at a record pace and get them properly trained and get them dispatched to places of need. And then finally, where the real magic will happen is when we get a chance to work on airspace redesign." The FAA maintains that SMART will provide recommendations and will not replace controllers' decision-making responsibilities. Its deployment has also drawn congressional scrutiny over safety testing, training and oversight.
Industry impact & what to watch
Business aviation flies largely on demand, with departure times set by passengers and owners instead of a published schedule. Traffic management tools designed around scheduled airline banks tend to treat that flying as noise to be absorbed. A system that ingests capacity, weather and staffing data and recommends route and departure adjustments ahead of congestion could, in principle, give unscheduled operators something they lack today: advance sight of where the system is tight. Bedford's comment about "zero visibility" is a claim about exactly that gap.
Whether that visibility reaches operators in a usable form is the open question, and it is a design one. Predictive recommendations that flow only to controllers and airline operations centers would leave a charter or owner-flown operator no better informed than now. How business aviation gets access to the output, and how unscheduled flights are weighted against airline traffic when the system proposes adjustments, will determine whether the benefit Bedford describes materializes.
The next milestones are the nationwide rollout following the Washington, D.C. start, the FAA's pursuit of the further $30 billion, and the congressional review of safety testing, training and oversight that SMART's deployment has already prompted. Results from the Washington-area operations, and the outcome of that scrutiny, are the evidence that would show whether the system performs for unscheduled flying as well as it is described.

















































